Compaq External RAID Controller & Subsystem Infortrend Uživatelský manuál Strana 24

  • Stažení
  • Přidat do mých příruček
  • Tisk
  • Strana
    / 34
  • Tabulka s obsahem
  • KNIHY
  • Hodnocené. / 5. Na základě hodnocení zákazníků
Zobrazit stránku 23
Notes: Patent Commercial Factor (PC/f)
Forward Citation Value: Compared to relevant patents within this semantic technology area, each extra citation per patent boosts market value
by 3%. Patents with two to three times the median number of forward citations carry a 35% value premium, and those with 20 citations and more
command a 54% market value premium. The factor bar indicates how this patent compares to the 100 most relevant in this technology area. (Patent
Applications rarely have forward citations.)
Enforcement Licensing: A higher enforcement (stick) licensing potential is shown when fewer applicants dominate this field, assuming that
higher costs of aggressive litigation correspond to higher long-term revenue potential. Interpret this factor bar IN THE INVERSE if the objective is to
broadly assert this patent against many smaller licensees who would see licensing as an annoying but affordable alternative to litigation.
Partnering Licensing: (TABLE B) Emerging technologies, or parallel inventions that exist outside of the Classification of this patent can present
unanticipated licensing opportunities into non-obvious patent classifications. The Patent Factor identifies non-obvious patent classifications of
closely related patents (based on semantic analysis of the claims of this patent).
Crowdedness: (TABLE C) A listing of potential licensees (applicants owning closely related patents). A larger number of companies with more
than one patent indicates broader industry investment in R&D, positively correlating to a more valuable commercial market.
Divestiture Licensing: A negative factor rating (red) means that this applicant only owns one patent listed in the most relevant 100, although
ownership of more patents that may not appear in the top 100 may also increase the discrete value of this patent, especially if this patent is
included in a licensing bundle.
Patent Competitive Group Position: Based on the premise that the list of the 100 most relevant patents defines the corpus of a technology
domain, ownership of more than one patent on the list would indicate broader market presence. If the owner of this patent owns a larger
percentage of the top 100 patents than other listed patent owners, it receives a higher score for its competitive position.
In-licensing Opportunity: This score applies only to US Patents, which can be filed and owned by an individual (i.e., "unassigned"). European
Patent Commercial Factor (PC/f)
OVERALL COMMERCIAL FACTOR SCORE
FORWARD CITATION VALUE CONTRIBUTION
A larger number of forward citations when compared to the 100 most closely related patents
disproportionately increases the value of this patent.
11.
BACKWARD CITATION VALUE CONTRIBUTION
The larger number of backward patent citations tend to suggest a larger market size. Backward
citations are a less reliable contributor to patent value than Forward Cites.
12.
ENFORCEMENT LICENSING POTENTIAL
Fewer applicants dominating a particular field present a more favorable environment to pursue more
costly opportunities to generate the highest revenue per licensee.
13.
PARTNERING LICENSING POTENTIAL (CROSS-CLASSIFICATION)
Licensing potential into non-obvious or unrelated patent classes is based on invention activity in
closely-related markets protected by different US classifications.
14.
CROWDEDNESS (POTENTIAL LICENSEES)
Crowdedness (more assignees practicing highly related patents that are within the top 100 most
relevant) suggests more activity in the market, and more licensing opportunities.
15.
DIVESTITURE LICENSING PREMIUM (PATENT GROUP)
Broader market protection corresponds to the increased number of patents, and value of each patent
this applicant owns (Patent Group) within the 100 most relevant.
16.
PATENT GROUP COMPETITIVE POSITION
The competitive position of this applicant's Patent Group relative to the size of other applicants' Patent
Groups identified within the 100 most relevant patents.
17.
IN-LICENSE OPPORTUNITY
For portfolio expansion through in-licensing: this index rates the relative number of high interest,
unassigned enforceable patents within the 100 most relevant.
18.
TABLE 2.0 - KEY COMMERCIAL INDEX METRICS 19.
Number of Different Classifications Within 100 Most Relevant Patents: 13
Potential Licensees (Applicants) Within 100 Most Relevant Patents: 33
Number of Unassigned Patents Within Top 100 (Informational): 15
Number of Patents Owned by This Applicant Within Top 100 (Patent Group): 13
20. [ About This Report | Definitions | Related Tables & Charts | References ]
11.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Generated2/23/20142:12:24PM©Copyright20052014∙PantrosIPPatentFactorIndexReportforUSB7934041Page24
Zobrazit stránku 23
1 2 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ... 33 34

Komentáře k této Příručce

Žádné komentáře